مولانا طارق جمیل کی خدمت میں کھلا خط

آج کل آپ کی تعریف میں کافی قصیدے لکھے جا رہے ہیں اور ہر دوسرا کالم نگار حضرت کی عامر خان کے ساتھ “انٹریکشن” کو بیان کرتا پھرتا ہے۔ میرے کچھ سوالات ہیں اور کچھ اعتراضات۔ جن دوستوں نے مولانا کی ویڈیو دیکھی ہے وہ جواب دے سکتے ہیں۔

 پہلا تو یہ کہ آپ کو اخلاقی طور پر بالکل بھی زیب نہیں دیتا تھا کہ وہ ایک شخص کے ساتھ اپنی ذاتی انٹریکشن کو پبلک میں اسکی اجازت کے بغیر بیان کر رہے ہیں۔ دوسری جس بات پر مجھے اعتراض ہے وہ یہ ہے کہ آپ کے ہر لفظ سے ایک خدائی غرور جھلک رہا ہے اور آپ کسی صورت بھی عامر خان کو اپنے آپ سے بہتر انسان سمجھنے کے لئیے آمادہ نہیں ہیں نہ تو فلمی شعبہ کے حوالے سے اور نہ ہی دینی شعبے کے حوالے سے۔ جبکہ مسلسل اس بات پر بھی اشد اصرار کر رہے ہیں کہ وہ ایک اہم آدمی ہے اور اس سے ملاقات کو باعث تفاخر بھی سمجھ رہے ہیں جیسا کہ عموما تبلیغی حضرات کرتے ہیں۔ سعید انور، یوسف یوحنا سے سلطان گولڈن اور شاہد آفریدی تک کی سیلیبرٹیز آپ لوگوں کا ٹریڈ مارک بن چکی ہیں اور باقاعدہ طور پر خواص میں جرنیلوں، بڑے گورنمنٹ آفیسروں اور اہم سیاستدانوں کے ہم پلہ ہی اہم جگہوں پر ایڈورٹائز کی جاتی ہیں۔

 مولانا آپ کو یہ بھی برا لگ رہا ہے کہ آپ عامر خان کی “حرام” فلم کی کامیابی کے لئیے کیونکر دعا فرمائیں۔ اسکے ساتھ آپ اسکا دل بھی نہیں دکھانا چاہتے۔ لیکن ایک مجمع میں یہ بات کر کے اپنی بڑائی بھی بیان کر رہے ہیں۔ حضور اب اگر عامر خان آپ کی یہ گفتگو سنے گا تو آپ کی کیا عزت رہ جائے گی؟ مجھے ایک دو دفعہ آپکو ڈائریکٹ سننے کا اتفاق ہوا ہے، اگر آپکے مقلدین نصرت جاوید کی طرح مجھے بھی نہ رگڑیں تو ایک عرض کروں؟ آپ کے لہجے میں مجھے شیرینی، محبت اور نصیحت کبھی نظر نہیں آئی۔ بلکہ رعونت، غرور، تکبر اور خدائی جلال کی نقل اور شور ہی نظر آیا ہے۔ جبکہ آپ اور آپ کے ہم پلہ و پیالہ فرماتے ہیں کہ تکبر خدا کو پسند نہیں۔ 

 برائے مہربانی لوگوں کے تقویٰ کا فیصلہ خدا پر چھوڑ دیں۔ مزید براں، آپ نے اپنی MBBS کی ڈگری چھوڑ کر کسی پر احسان نہیں فرمایا۔ ایک غریب آدمی ایسا نہیں کر سکتا، جو اپنی دیہاڑی، ریڑہی اور نوکری چھوڑ کر سہ روزوں، چلوں اور سال کے دوروں پر جاتے ہیں، انکی نہ تو جائیدادیں ہوتی ہیں اور نہ ہی اہل و عیال کے کفیل۔ وہ اپنی آخرت کے چکر میں کافی لوگوں کی دنیاوی پریشانی کا باعث بن رہے ہوتے ہیں۔

 والسلام،

 ایک خیر خواہ

 عاکف خان

Click Here to See the Video of Tariq Jamil
This article is also published at Rationalist Society of Pakistan's Blog. 

Post by Akif Khan.

ذاتی رائے

عاکف خان

اس وقت ملک کی دگرگوں صورتحال میں مہنگائی، غربت، تعلیم، دہشت گردی، بھوک اور لوڈشیڈنگ سے بالاتر دو مسائل ہیں جن پر ساری قوم غوروغوض کرنے میں مصروف ہے۔ میںنے سوچا میں بھی موقع سے فائدہ اٹھاؤں۔ تمیزالدین رپورٹ کی گریٹ ڈیبیٹ "کون کافر ہے اور کون مسلمان" کو درمیان میں چھوڑ کر قوم اس وقت ایک تو اس قومی ڈیبیٹ میں مشغول ہے کہ کون شہید ہے اور دوسرا مسئلہ ہے اظہار ذاتی رائے کا۔

میری ذاتی رائے کے مطابق ذاتی رائے ایک انتہائی واضح معانی کا حامل ایک لفظ تھا۔ لیکن گزشتہ کچھ عرصے سے اس بے ضرر لفظ کا انتہائی جارحانہ استعمال شروع کر دیا گیا ہے۔ آپ کسی سیاسی جماعت کے سربراہ ہیں اور آپ کوئی بھی بیان داغ دیں- اگر وہ موافق نہ آیا تو آپ کے اہلکار اسکو آپ کی ایک ذاتی رائے قرار دے کر آپ کی جان چھڑا دیں گے۔

Charachteristics of a Patriotic Pakistani Mard-i-Momin

Why is it that I found most of the people in Pakistan with this same profile. They believe in following things unanimously.

1. Imran Khan is the hope and he will bring the change.

2. There are Good Taliban and Bad Taliban.

3. Good Taliban are very peaceful and they just goto Afghanistan to fight US.

4. Bad Taliban are RAW/CIA agents.

5. We need Shariah in Pakistan.

Glimpses of Cities: Old Photos - Vintage Lahore

Courtesy: Farid Alvie

Rudyard Kipling's House in 1890s

My white paper on PTI's 100 days performance in KPK

The night of the election, I was thinking only one thing; which party to vote? My whole family was going

for PTI. Already having tested PMLN and PPP, they had no other option. On ideological grounds, I wanted to go for left, i.e. ANP or AWP. But there was no candidate contesting on their behalf. All four of the candidates of PMLN and PPP were not the people with good history. And unfortunately to my dismay both of the PTI candidates were good reputed and educated people. So it was quite a distress for me and I was still indecisive when I went to bed.

In the bed I had been thinking  the same things. I knew my vote was not a big deal. But I had heard that every vote is important and it counts and it is one's duty to cast it. On the other hand I had no choice but to vote for Khan. I have no personal problems with Khan. But the way he showed dreams to Pakistani youth and people was very unrealistic for me. I have strong reservations towards his narcissism, his affiliations with Jamat i Islami, his weird interpretations of Iqbal's poetry, his Modoodian version of Sharia' (same as that of Zia ul Haq), his hatred towards liberals (his hypocrisy, because he has remained the same in his youth,) and his habit of boasting high. I did not want to give the future of my children in this man's hands.

Deeyat Laws: Social Impact of the level of strictness in laws; A Discussion

When Shahzeb Khan's family granted pardon to their son's murderer, whole nation came to utter shock. This was one of the most fought causes by civil society and people from all professions and backgrounds on the basis of barbaric show of feudal power. In the aftermath of the murder, which was committed by son of a very influential person of Sindh, people went in streets, protested and started mass movement with support of media to put the culprit behind the bars. 

Shahzeb was killed in cold blood because of saving honor of his family when the servant of this politician's son was bullying his sister despite of several warnings and he asked him to stop. The murderer, Shahrukh Jatoi out of vanity went after Shahzeb, they fell into arguments and Shahrukh and his friend opened fire on him. Shahzeb, young and educated person, belonged to a upper middle class family. However, after Sharukh tried to escape from Pakistan, was caught in UAE and was brought back. He was prosecuted in criminal court as well as Anti Terrorism Court. It was kind of Jessica Murder Case of Pakistan. 

Previews from Interesting Recent Scientific Advances

1) The World of Wonderful Mathematics

Source: cliffmass.blogspot.com

This one I happened to see on Scientific American blog and is quite interesting. Starting from a comment on an Onion News (Satirical News Emag) article on 27 new functions in trigonometry, author Dr. Evelyn Lamb, University of Utah introduces to 10 unheard functions of trigonometry.

After such a long time I came by some superb blog on trigonometric function and log scales, maths to be precise. It reminded me of my school days, thanks to my father when he used to ask us to solve trig and log problems via conventional means i.e. using log tables and papers. Feeling proud of the fact that I still know how to make my own trig table out of nothing. I don't know if our calculator/computer dependent generation has any idea how much fun is math.

Here is an excerpt from the blog,

Orthodox Patriarchal Agenda at work

Can you believe this bullshit? The guy is serious. This man Maulana Pandit Pastor Raylan Alleman has outclassed all the orthodox bullshit that we come across in South Asia. Guess all dogmas have same misogynist patriarchal agenda. However this piece posted on Fix the Family Citadel Catholic Media, an organisation to promote family system in Catholicism, is informative in the sense that a major set of counter-arguments, feminists use to present everyday, can be learnt from this blog. And of course shame on this thinking. Read this excerpt to make some blood boil to rejuvenate the feminist code!

"The indoctrination of the feminist culture and the practicing of a sexually promiscuous lifestyle severely cloud, practically blind that good judgment. Getting a college degree often makes a young lady feel an “obligation” to use it, to make money. Often her husband doesn’t want to see it go to “waste.” So the degree is what actually traps her. Not having a degree frees her to enter into a marriage with proper roles in which her husband will provide for her and their children. Christian marriage by definition does place her in a submissive role to her husband, but no one forces anyone to marry anyone. "

Here is the link

http://www.fixthefamily.com/blog/6-reasons-to-not-send-your-daughter-to-college

وڈیرا شاہی، طالبان اور اے پی سی

کل جب نوجوان شاہزیب کے قاتل کو شاہزیب کے والدین کی طرف سے معافی ملنے کی خبر سنی تو سارا دن جھنجھلاہٹ طاری

رہی اور خون جلتا رہا۔ کہ یہ کیسا ملک ہے جہاں ایک قتل کو ریاست کے خلاف بغاوت تصور ہی نہیں کیا جاتا، جہاں ایک ظالم اپنی بریت کے بعد فتح کے نشان بناتا ہے، جہاں قانون کی بالادستی کی یہ حد ہے کہ قاتل دھونس دھاندلی، طاقت اور پیسے کے بل بوتے پر پوری انسانیت کے خلاف جرم پر بھی باعزت بری ہو جاتا ہے۔ جہاں دیعت اور معافی جیسےراستوں سے ایک بااثر شخص قانون کی گرفت سے مکھن میں سے بال کی طرح نکل جاتا ہے، وہاں 80٪ غریب لوگوں کا خون کوئی معنی ہی نہیں رکھتا۔ کہیں ذیادہ دبائو پڑا تو پیسہ اور طاقت کو استعمال کر لیا۔

کیلے کی پٹائی

مبینہ کیلا حوالات جانے سے پہلے

۔(اسلام آباد، مملکت خداداد) کل ایک کیلے کو مسجد کے باہر بغیر چھلکے پڑا دیکھ کر مومنین نے مار مار کے اسکا شیک بنا ڈالا۔ کیلے نے مبینہ طور پر رمضان مبارک کی توہین کی تھی۔ اسلامی ملک میں رمضان المبارک کے تقدس کے لیئے خاص قوانین موجود ہیں۔ پاکستان ایک اسلامی ریاست ہے جہاں ٪95 سے زائد آبادی مسلمان ہے۔ 80 کی دہائی  میں ان اسلامی قوانین کی تشکیل کے بعد ریاستی سرپرستی میں مومنین کو نصاب، نسیم حجازی کے ناولوں اور کوڑوں کی مدد سے ان قوانین کے بارے میں آگہی فراہم کی گئی تھی جس کی افادیت اس کیلے کے انجام سے واضح ہوتی ہے۔ کیلے کے خلاف تھانہ کوہکن میں احترام رمضان آرڈیننس مروجہ 1981، سیکشن4 اور پاکستان پینل کوڈ، دفعہ 295-الف کے تحت مسجد کے مولانا صاحب کی قیادت میں  ایف آئی آر درج کروا دی گئی ہے۔

Being an idealist; Curse or a Gift?

This article has been published in Monthly Laaltain magazine and can also be read here.

The people who are driven by passion always (or may be most frequently) end up in alienation by society and in loneliness. I always wondered why is that so? How come brilliant minds like scholars, sufis, scientists, writers, artists and great musicians end up in such an agony. Still I found most of them contended. It seemed like societal norms did not apply on them. So the agony part was always doubtful. I was told that they become narcissists and hence they lose the balance that social adjustment requires. I tried to study the private lives of these people. From Aristotle to Russel, Voltaire to Neitzsche, Einstein to Edison and Planck, Faiz Ahmed Faiz to Dr. Abdus Salam and Eqbal Ahmed, Muneer Niazi to Michael Jackson.

ملالہ کا ڈرامہ – سازشی نظریے

پوری دنیا کے ٹی وی، اخبارات اور نیوز چینلز پر چلنے والے آج کل ایک رجحان کی ہی بات کرتے ہیں جس میں ہماری قوم گھری ہوئی ہے۔ ڈرامے کا مرکزی کردار ٹین ایجر ملالہ یوسفزئی نے انجام دیا، ڈرامے میں نام نہاد طالبان عورتوں کے حقوق اور تعلیم کے لیے آواز اٹھانے پر ملالہ کو گولی مار دیتے ہیں۔ طالبان سے منسوب تمام کہانیاں محض افسانہ ہی تو ہیں حالانکہ طالبان تو اس روئے زمین کے سب سے معزز اور امن پسند لوگ ہیں۔ کالی پگڑیاں باندھنے والے ان خراسانیوں کے بارے میں پیشین گوئی کی گئی ہے کہ یہ اسلام کے رکھوالے ہیں اور بس چند برے لوگوں کی وجہ سے ہی بدنام ہیں جو کہ سی آئی اے، را اور موساد کے اہلکار ہیں۔ 

Green House Effect of US-Taliban talks

Comments on the article by Hussain Haqqani in NY Times today.

Agreeing to Haqqani, I guess US is aiming for short term goals over here. Adding to the same, the next battleground of Taliban ideological warfare will be Pakistan and it will be source for their ideology dissemination and manpower recruitment. No matter how much we reject this but TTP and other Taliban groups like Maulvi Nazir and Haqqani group in Pakistan have clearly expressed several times that they consider Mullah Omar as Ameer-ul-Momineen and their Jihad is the extension of Afghan Jihad against US supported democratic (Democracy = Kafirana Nizam) country, Pak Army and people of Pakistan who elected this government.

Cut the crap - 1

When I get up in the morning, usually it’s this annoying sound of alarm. Three alarms that I have set on my phone. One rings at 7:50 am, second at 8:15 am and third at 8:30 am. I am obsessed with this grammatical structure that I wrote the missing “AMs” with the last two times and capitalized the one in this sentence. So much that I corrected the previous sentence when Word gave an error with green underline and I am still thinking about the word "structure" in that sentence that whether it is rightly put or not. “Composition” came to my mind as an alternate. But I really don’t care for this one at least. Let it be like his even if it is wrong. Anyways, I don’t want to search google if “anyway” is right or “anyways” is right and whether these two should be inside commas. Hell I care, because I don’t want anyone to understand what I am writing either. Why the hell this cursor frantically moves many tabs ahead – errr?

Bloody Self-Righteousness Syndrome

This self-righteousness is the reason that others get offensive to you. This self-righteousness of yours is the reason that others attack your faith. Do you realize, how much hurting is it when somebody judges you due to your faith? You can realize this only when you are in the same situation. When somebody makes a movie or writes a book, how much is it hurtful to you? You never realize that same is true for others when you break their idols, call them inferior, kafir, don't reply to their salutations the same way. This is because your ego does not accept that you are inferior to somebody else.

Here the question is not that you do not consider your's superior. Everybody does. Do that. But keep it to yourself. Don’t make it impact the lives of others. Don’t make your own ego affect others. Don’t make your superiority kill anyone else. Keep it to yourself. It is your personal matter and it is the other person’s personal matter.

At least, you should realize that it is a bloody personal thing of other person and he/she is responsible for that, NOT you. You have no right to judge anyone else. You have no right to judge if someone is right or wrong.

The Battles of (Ir)Rationality

Last week I shared an article of Greenwald, which was in reply to Sam Harris and Dawkins "irrational Islamophobia" and alongwith it the emails exchange between Sam Harris and Greenwald on RSOP, when he retweeted Murtaza Hussain's (A toronto based columnist) article on Sam Harris and Dawkins attitude. This is Dawkins infamous quote which spurred a debate in liberal as well as atheist circles,

"Haven’t read Koran so couldn’t quote chapter & verse like I can for Bible. But often say Islam [is the] greatest force for evil today."

This one is in continuation to that. The question is, is new-atheism synonamous to Islamophobia? This is what Harris says about it,

"There is no such thing as “Islamophobia.” This is a term of propaganda designed to protect Islam from the forces of secularism by conflating all criticism of it with racism and xenophobia. And it is doing its job, because people like you have been taken in by it."

Here is a reply of Sam Harris to Greenwald (courtesy: Faraz Talat) and here is Greenwald's email exchange with Harris. This is Mortaza Hussain's article. Another similar article written by Nathan Lean is here.

Mortaza has this to say,

"Just as it is incumbent upon Muslims to marginalise their own violent extremists, mainstream atheists must work to disavow those such as Harris who would tarnish their movement by associating it with a virulently racist, violent and exploitative worldview"

In addition, here is Nathan Lean's concluding paragraph.

"How the New Atheists’ anti-Muslim hate advances their belief that God does not exist is not exactly clear. In this climate of increased anti-Muslim sentiment, it’s a convenient digression, though. They’ve shifted their base and instead of simply trying to convince people that God is a myth, they’ve embraced the monster narrative of the day. That’s not rational or enlightening or “free thinking” or even intelligent. That’s opportunism. If atheism writ large was a tough sell to skeptics, the “New Atheism,” Muslim-bashing atheism, must be like selling Bibles to believers. After all, those who are convinced that God exists, and would otherwise dismiss the Dawkins’ and Harris’s of the world as hell-bound kooks, are often some of the biggest Islamophobes. It’s symbiosis — and as a biologist, Dawkins should know a thing or two about that. Proving that a religion — any religion — is evil, though, is just as pointless and impossible an endeavor as trying to prove that God does or doesn’t exist. Neither has been accomplished yet. And neither will."

Relating to the Dawkins episode, this account is shared by Asad Masood with this comment "a few months ago Peter Higgs called Dawkins 'almost fundamentalist." This story by Alok Jha, published in The Guardian can be read here. Thanks to Asad, he provided another story by Nigel Farndale on the same.

However, in my opinion not only these new-atheists, especially Sam Harris are consciously or unconsciously beginning to develop Islamophobia but extremists, western salafists and modern Islamists like Anjem Ch. and Hizb-ut-Tehrir also hide behind "Islamophobia excuse" to justify their weird attitudes and self-righteous ideologies.